Sussex Duchess Reveals 2018 Police Warning Regarding Father
Meghan Markle discloses that the Metropolitan Police informed her of disturbing claims about Thomas Markle Sr. in 2018, a detail that has now surfaced amid fresh scrutiny of his digital devices.
By Fatima Popov ·

A quiet exchange between the Metropolitan Police and the Duchess of Sussex in 2018 has emerged as the central tension in a renewed dispute over her estranged father. Meghan Markle’s team disclosed that officials alerted her to "disturbing allegations" against Thomas Markle Sr. years before the current media storm erupted. This revelation complicates the narrative, suggesting the family had earlier signals of potential trouble that were not publicly addressed.
The core of the new allegations centers on digital evidence allegedly discovered in the Philippines. The Sun newspaper reported that Markle’s half-brother, Thomas Markle Jr., told local detectives he found a large collection of child sexual abuse images on computers and mobile phones. These devices were stored in four large boxes at their father's former residence in Cebu. Markle Jr. estimated the number of images could range from hundreds to thousands, a claim that has triggered a formal inquiry by local authorities.
Markle Sr. has pushed back against the accusations with strong force. Speaking from a rehabilitation facility in Florida, where he is recovering from a leg amputation, he described the claims as "sick lies." He expressed shock at the timing of the accusations, noting that he had left his home in Mexico in January 2025 for a "fresh start" in the Philippines. He maintains that the computers in question were not in his direct possession during that period, which he believes undermines the validity of the findings.
The Duchess’s statement offers a different perspective on her distance from her father. Through a spokesperson, she explained that a letter sent to the Met’s Royalty and Specialist Protection unit in 2018 was later shared with her. She stated that this communication detailed troubling claims and that she was assured an investigation was underway. Her decision to limit contact between her father and her children, she said, was driven by a desire to protect them, trusting that authorities were safeguarding other families in similar situations.
Context suggests why this information remained private for so long. Sources indicate that speaking out in 2018 might have jeopardized future legal steps or exposed Meghan to potential lawsuits. The Rasp unit is understood to have passed the letter to her shortly after her wedding. The Met has clarified that it has not previously investigated Markle Sr. and is not currently doing so, though it is conducting internal reviews to confirm if Rasp officers were indeed involved in sharing the document.
Investigations are proceeding on multiple fronts. Philippine officials have confirmed that a specialized taskforce in Cebu is handling the case. Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla stated that national police have secured the father’s computer for a digital forensic examination, with results expected within a week. Meanwhile, the FBI has indicated it will support local authorities and look into any potential federal violations of US law, adding an international dimension to the inquiry.
Family dynamics remain strained, with accusations flying in both directions. Samantha Markle, the father’s other daughter, has defended him by suggesting her brother is fabricating stories for financial gain. She pointed out that the claims emerged shortly after their father cut off his financial support. She also highlighted that the computers had been out of his possession for two years, arguing that this gap leaves significant room for potential tampering with the digital evidence.
The estrangement between the Duchess and her father dates back to his absence from her wedding to Prince Harry, which he cited as being due to health issues. He has never met his grandchildren, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. As the forensic results from the Philippines are awaited, the focus remains on whether the digital files will provide definitive proof or leave questions unanswered about the timeline of events.
Source: The Guardian





